Judges+Paradigm

Davis, Chad (cx) judged brittany williams and zavier whingham (aff) (grapevine tournament). This judge voted neg. The judge said "The neg won on framework, debate good, and the affs drop on theory. The aff needed a story as to how they solve anything and needed to defend there version of the debate better, specifically in answering actual negative arguments. http://judgephilosophies.wikispaces.com/Davis%2C+Chad

Round 3 same tournament judged colton donica and lucero pina (aff). The aff won against wakeland. The judge said, "Neg won on T. Affraid not have enough answers or analysis in 2AC and 1AR, and most of 1AR answer, while good, were mostly new.

Bunas, Shae (cx) judged brittany williams and zavier whingham (neg) (grapevine tournament). This jugde gave no critique of the debate. The affirmative won. http://judgephilosophies.wikispaces.com/Bunas%2C+Shae

Zwick, Dillon (cx) judge colton donica and lucero pina (neg) (grapevine tournament). The affirmative won this round. The judge gave no citique of the debate.

Stevens, Ryan (cx) judged colton donica and lucero pina (aff) (grapevine tournament). The neg won this round (greenhill). The judges critique is as follows " CP solves most of case, very little link in 1AR, large risk of politix." http://judgephilosophies.wikispaces.com/Stevens%2C+Ryan

Also judged eddie camacho and charlie stephens (aff) (grapevine tournament). The aff won this round against (greenhill). The judges critique was "No risk of d.a., presumption shifts aff in world of cp.

Holladay, Kathle (cx) judged brittany williams and zavier (aff) (grapevine tournament). The aff won the round against (desoto). The judge gave the following critique: "Love the performance aff. And thinking outside the box- very refreshing to get to think and have cards hurled at me. I do not believe the refugee counter plan linked to the case. I see that neg wanted to prove refugees were not treated well. But affs performance based case was dealing with racism and white supremacy- solving your people identity and oppression and a mind set. The plan and the counter plan breaking to chain of racism. Interesting debate. The cp doesn't solve all racism. http://judgephilosophies.wikispaces.com/Holladay%2C+Kathy

Agha, Samin (cx) judged eddie camacho and charlie stephens (aff) (grapevine tofurnament). The aff won this round against joshua bl. The judge gave no critique of the round. http://judgephilosophies.wikispaces.com/Agha%2C+Samin

Ferguson, Glenda (cx) judged colton donica and lucero pina (neg) (grapevine tournament) The neg won this round against austin sfa lr. The judge gave the following critique : there is no answer to T. http://judgephilosophies.wikispaces.com/Ferguson%2C+Glenda